A land transaction has reached the registration stage and BPHTB has been processed, but verification of the Regional Tax Payment Slip (SSPD) has not been completed. In this situation, a common concern is whether all land administration must stop until verification is complete.
The Joint Circular of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of BPN and the Minister of Home Affairs Number 16/SE-HR.01/VIII/2026 and Number 900.1.13.1/5782/SJ provides a clearer mechanism. In certain circumstances, land registration can continue even though BPHTB SSPD verification results are unavailable.
Read Also:
BPHTB Rules Change in 2026: What Does This Mean for Land Sales and Registration?
BPHTB Underpayment After Land Registration: What Are the Consequences?
However, continuation of the process does not mean the BPHTB obligation is considered settled. Requirements must be fulfilled, and subsequent land services may be temporarily suspended until BPHTB status is resolved.
For buyers, sellers, companies, and investors conducting property transactions, these provisions matter because they concern the direct relationship between local tax obligations and land services.
What Does an Unverified BPHTB SSPD Mean?
A BPHTB SSPD is a document relating to payment of the Duty on the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights.
During land registration, local governments examine and verify the documents and data forming the basis of BPHTB obligations.
This process may include, among other things, document examination, the Tax Object Acquisition Value, or NPOP, and consistency between local tax data and land data.
In certain circumstances, land registration can proceed when BPHTB SSPD verification has not been completed.
The practical distinction to make is:
unverified is not the same as exempt from BPHTB obligations.
Tax status can still be examined, and if an underpayment is later identified, that obligation can still be collected.
Land Registration Can Continue
The Joint Circular provides that land registration services using BPHTB SSPD verification results that are not yet verified can continue subject to certain requirements.
One of its main provisions is:
the land registration process continues.
This is a significant point because it provides a mechanism under which land administration stages do not always have to wait for the entire BPHTB verification process to be completed.
However, continuation is accompanied by safeguards for tax obligations that may arise later.
A Statement of Willingness to Pay a BPHTB Shortfall Is Mandatory
The next requirement is a statement of willingness to pay any BPHTB shortfall.
This means the taxpayer declares willingness to settle an underpayment if subsequent verification finds that the BPHTB payable exceeds the amount already paid.
This provision matters because continuation of land registration does not remove the local government’s right to examine and collect payment.
In practice, the parties to the transaction need to understand that land registration status and the final status of the BPHTB obligation may be at different stages.
The transaction should therefore not be considered fully completed merely because registration has moved to the next stage.
There Is a Risk of Temporary Suspension of Subsequent Land Services
Another important consequence is temporary suspension of subsequent land service applications.
In other words, a land parcel whose registration continued with incomplete BPHTB verification may face restrictions on subsequent land services until that BPHTB status is resolved.
The Land Office may then confirm BPHTB verification status through a host-to-host mechanism.
If the temporary suspension cannot be resolved within 90 calendar days from its recording, the local government and Land Office jointly monitor settlement of the BPHTB obligation.
The 90-day provision does not diminish the taxpayer’s rights or alter the provisions on the limitation period for local tax collection.
What Happens If a BPHTB Shortfall Is Identified?
If examination results show an unpaid BPHTB obligation, it is still settled under local tax provisions.
The local government may issue collection instruments such as:
- a Regional Tax Collection Notice, or STPD; or
- a Regional Tax Underpayment Assessment, or SKPDKB.
Authority to collect BPHTB shortfalls rests with the local government.
Continuation of land registration before verification is complete should therefore not be understood as a mechanism for avoiding tax obligations.
Instead, this provision allows land services to continue while BPHTB obligations can still be settled later if a shortfall is identified.
What About Zero BPHTB?
The Joint Circular also provides specific provisions for unverified Zero BPHTB, or zero BPHTB liability.
In this situation, land registration may continue only if the taxpayer has applied to the regional head for a certificate stating that the acquisition is not subject to BPHTB, in accordance with applicable provisions.
In addition, the following are required:
- proof of receipt of the application for a certificate of non-liability to BPHTB; and
- a statement of willingness to pay any BPHTB shortfall.
Zero BPHTB therefore has its own requirements and cannot immediately be equated with an ordinary unverified BPHTB SSPD.
This needs to be checked from the outset so that the parties do not prepare the wrong documents.
Why Does Reviewing Documents Before a Transaction Remain Important?
Although land registration can continue in certain circumstances, the safest approach remains ensuring that data and documents are consistent from the outset.
Some matters that should be checked include:
Land Parcel Data
NIB, land area, location, the right number, and property information must correspond to the land documents used.
The PBB-P2 NOP
An NOP discrepancy can lead to additional examination and become one factor extending the process.
The Transaction Value
The transaction value or NPOP needs to be explainable with appropriate documents if requested during examination.
The Parties’ Identities
Names, National Identity Numbers (NIK), and other data need to be consistent across transaction documents, tax data, and land documents.
Company Documents
If land is owned or transferred by a business entity, the signatory’s authority and necessary corporate approvals also need to be checked.
In transactions involving company assets or material values, JHYlegal can help conduct legal due diligence on land documents and the legal aspects of property transactions before the transfer of rights. This review can help identify issues in rights status, the parties’ authority, or document consistency before the BPHTB and land registration stages.
Registration in Progress Does Not Mean the Risk Is Resolved
This is the most important point of the mechanism.
If land registration continues while the BPHTB SSPD is unverified, two processes need to remain under monitoring:
first, completion of land services;
second, final settlement of the BPHTB obligation.
The two processes are interconnected.
If BPHTB turns out to be underpaid, the tax obligation must still be settled. If that status remains unresolved, subsequent land services may be temporarily suspended.
Companies or investors should therefore do more than monitor whether the certificate or registration has been processed; they should also ensure the BPHTB obligation is fully settled.
JHYlegal can provide legal assistance with transactions and land document reviews, including helping companies identify legal risks that may affect the transfer or registration of land rights. Assistance of this kind becomes increasingly relevant when a transaction involves multiple documents, a large investment value, or discrepancies between land and tax data.
Conclusion
Incomplete BPHTB verification does not always mean land registration must stop.
Under the mechanism in the 2026 Joint Circular, land registration can continue in certain circumstances with a statement of willingness to pay any BPHTB shortfall.
However, there is an important consequence: subsequent land services may be temporarily suspended until BPHTB status is resolved, and local governments can still collect underpayments.
For zero BPHTB, there are additional requirements in the form of an application for a certificate of non-liability to BPHTB and proof of receipt of that application.
Flexibility in registration should therefore not be considered an elimination of risk. Land status and BPHTB obligations still need to be fully resolved to avoid problems with subsequent land services.